Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer / Abemaciclib en adyuvancia para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama precoz de alto riesgo

Objective: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Method: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. Results: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598–0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). Conclusions: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for...(AU)

Objetivo: Adaptar el informe GHEMA de abemaciclib, un inhibidor de quinasas dependientes de ciclinas 4 y 6, con autorización de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en abril de 2022 para el tratamiento adyuvante de pacientes adultos con cáncer de mama precoz, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo, con afectación ganglionar y riesgo elevado de recaída; en combinación con hormonoterapia. Método: La eficacia y seguridad de abemaciclib se evaluó en un estudio fase III multicéntrico, aleatorizado y abierto. Se incluyeron 5.637 pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer de mama precoz con ganglios positivos, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo y alto riesgo de recaída. El criterio de alto riesgo se definió como la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos, o de 1–3 ganglios y al menos una de las siguientes características: tamaño del tumor ≥5 cm, grado histológico 3 o Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados (1:1) a recibir durante 2 años abemaciclib + hormonoterapia (n = 2.808) u hormonoterapia sola (n = 2.829). En ambos brazos el tratamiento con hormonoterapia se mantuvo mínimo 5 años. Resultados: Con una mediana de seguimiento de 15,5 meses, abemaciclib + hormonoterapia mostró beneficio significativo frente a la hormonoterapia sola [HR = 0,747 (IC95% 0,598-0,932), p = 0,0096], con una mejora absoluta del 3,5% en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva a 2 los años. Este beneficio se mantuvo con una mediana de seguimiento de 27,7 meses, logrando una mejora en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva del 2,7% y del 5,4% a los 2 y 3 años, respectivamente. La incidencia de efectos adversos grado 3–4 fue superior en el brazo de abemaciclib (45,9% vs. 12,9%); e incluía neutropenia (19,6% vs. 0,8%), leucopenia (11,4% vs. 0,4%) y diarrea (7,8% vs. 0,2%). Conclusiones: Los resultados del ensayo pivotal son suficientes para considerar abemaciclib como...(AU)

Abemaciclib en adyuvancia para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama precoz de alto riesgo / Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer

Objective: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Method: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. Results: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598–0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). Conclusions: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for...(AU)

Objetivo: Adaptar el informe GHEMA de abemaciclib, un inhibidor de quinasas dependientes de ciclinas 4 y 6, con autorización de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en abril de 2022 para el tratamiento adyuvante de pacientes adultos con cáncer de mama precoz, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo, con afectación ganglionar y riesgo elevado de recaída; en combinación con hormonoterapia. Método: La eficacia y seguridad de abemaciclib se evaluó en un estudio fase III multicéntrico, aleatorizado y abierto. Se incluyeron 5.637 pacientes diagnosticados de cáncer de mama precoz con ganglios positivos, receptor hormonal positivo, receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico negativo y alto riesgo de recaída. El criterio de alto riesgo se definió como la presencia de ≥ 4 ganglios positivos, o de 1–3 ganglios y al menos una de las siguientes características: tamaño del tumor ≥5 cm, grado histológico 3 o Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados (1:1) a recibir durante 2 años abemaciclib + hormonoterapia (n = 2.808) u hormonoterapia sola (n = 2.829). En ambos brazos el tratamiento con hormonoterapia se mantuvo mínimo 5 años. Resultados: Con una mediana de seguimiento de 15,5 meses, abemaciclib + hormonoterapia mostró beneficio significativo frente a la hormonoterapia sola [HR = 0,747 (IC95% 0,598-0,932), p = 0,0096], con una mejora absoluta del 3,5% en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva a 2 los años. Este beneficio se mantuvo con una mediana de seguimiento de 27,7 meses, logrando una mejora en la tasa de supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva del 2,7% y del 5,4% a los 2 y 3 años, respectivamente. La incidencia de efectos adversos grado 3–4 fue superior en el brazo de abemaciclib (45,9% vs. 12,9%); e incluía neutropenia (19,6% vs. 0,8%), leucopenia (11,4% vs. 0,4%) y diarrea (7,8% vs. 0,2%). Conclusiones: Los resultados del ensayo pivotal son suficientes para considerar abemaciclib como...(AU)

Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar? / Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First?

El paciente con melanoma avanzado, metastásico o de alto riesgo, cuenta con opciones de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia y terapias dirigidas, que han mejorado significativamente su supervivencia. El 50% de los pacientes con melanoma presentan mutación del gen BRAF. La toma de decisiones en cuanto a la secuencia óptima de tratamiento sistémico debe tener en cuenta factores relacionados con el medicamento, factores clínicos del paciente, así como los propios del tumor. Aunque la combinación ipilimumab-nivolumab es la que proporciona mejores resultados de supervivencia en todos los pacientes, la toxicidad asociada y el perfil de las terapias diana las puede hacer recomendables como primera línea en pacientes en determinadas situaciones clínicas. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar un algoritmo de toma de decisiones en cuanto a la primera línea de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia vs. terapias dirigidas, en el paciente con melanoma avanzado con mutación BRAF (AU)

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma (AU)

[Translated article] Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First? / Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma (AU)

El paciente con melanoma avanzado, metastásico o de alto riesgo, cuenta con opciones de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia y terapias dirigidas, que han mejorado significativamente su supervivencia. El 50% de los pacientes con melanoma presentan mutación del gen BRAF. La toma de decisiones en cuanto a la secuencia óptima de tratamiento sistémico debe tener en cuenta factores relacionados con el medicamento, factores clínicos del paciente, así como los propios del tumor. Aunque la combinación ipilimumab-nivolumab es la que proporciona mejores resultados de supervivencia en todos los pacientes, la toxicidad asociada y el perfil de las terapias diana las puede hacer recomendables como primera línea en pacientes en determinadas situaciones clínicas. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar un algoritmo de toma de decisiones en cuanto a la primera línea de tratamiento sistémico, inmunoterapia vs. terapias dirigidas, en el paciente con melanoma avanzado con mutación BRAF (AU)

Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First? / Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

[Translated article] Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer. / [Artículo traducido] Abemaciclib en adyuvancia para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama precoz de alto riesgo.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorisation (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. METHOD: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5,637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3 or Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (n = 2,808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2,829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib + endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone (HR = 0.747 [95% CI 0.598-0.932], p = 0.0096); achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3-years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%) and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer in highly selected patients. However, in order to the efficacy results present less uncertainty, we must wait for a evaluation later, in which we can have a mature determination at 3 years (with more patients at risk).

Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training as an adjunct to trauma-focused psychotherapy in traumatized refugees and asylum seekers: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Refugees with exposure to multiple traumatic events are at high risk for developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Narrative exposure therapy (NET) is an effective treatment for the core symptoms of PTSD, but it does not reliably reduce depressive symptoms. Endurance exercise on the other hand was consistently found to be effective in treating depression making it a promising adjunct to NET. Up to date, no studies exist investigating the combination of NET and endurance exercise in a sample of refugees with PTSD and comorbid depression.Objectives: In the proposed randomized controlled trial, we aim to investigate whether a combination of NET and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training (MAET) enhances treatment outcome for refugees with PTSD and comorbid depressive symptoms. We expect a greater improvement in psychopathology in participants who receive the combined treatment.Methods and analysis: 68 refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD and clinically relevant depressive symptoms will be recruited in the proposed study. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either NET only (NET-group) or NET plus MAET (NET+-group). All participants will receive 10 NET sessions. Participants in the NET+-group will additionally take part in MAET. Primary (PTSD, depression) and secondary (general mental distress, agoraphobia and somatoform complaints, sleep quality) outcome measures will be assessed before treatment, after treatment, and at six-month follow-up. The hypotheses will be tested with multiple 2 × 3 mixed ANOVA's.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00022145.

Refugees are at particularly high risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depressive symptoms due to exposure to multiple man-made traumatic events.Narrative exposure therapy reliably reduces symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, but many patients retain their clinical diagnosis, untreated comorbid depressive symptoms may interfere with treatment response.The randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether combining narrative exposure therapy with moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training enhances treatment outcomes for refugees with posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depressive symptoms, compared to narrative exposure therapy as a stand-alone treatment.

Tumor fibroso pleural ¿son realmente benignos? ¿Cuándo deben operarse? / Pleural fibrous tumor, are they really benign? When should they have operation?

El tumor fibroso pleural es un tumor habitualmente asintomático, benigno y de lento crecimiento, que en un pequeño porcentaje de los casos tiene un comportamiento más agresivo. Para definir los criterios de malignidad es necesario un análisis inmunohistoquímico. El tratamiento de elección es la resección quirúrgica completa con márgenes de seguridad ya sea por toracotomía o por videotoracoscopia en función del tamaño. Se encuentra en estudio la utilización de terapia adyuvante radioterápica o quimioterápica que en el momento actual no cuenta con resultados significativos. Presentamos dos casos que fueron tratados de forma quirúrgica, con extirpación completa siendo el primero definido como maligno según los criterios histológicos y el segundo benigno, pero de alto riesgo. Solo uno de ellos recibió terapia adyuvante. (AU)

Solitary fibrous pleural tumor is a usually asymptomatic, benign and slow-growing tumor, which in a small percentage of cases has a more aggressive behavior. To define the malignancy criteria, an immunohistochemical analysis is necessary. The gold standard treatment is a complete surgical resection with safety margins either by thoracotomy or by videothoracoscopy depending on the size. The use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy is under study, which at the present time does not have significant results. We present two cases that were treated surgically, with complete removal, one being classified as malignant according to histological criteria and the other benign but high risk. Only one of them received adjuvant therapy. (AU)

Abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt the GHEMA report of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. European Medicines Agency authorization (April 2022) includes, in combination with endocrine therapy, the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. METHOD: The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib were evaluated in a randomized, open-label, and multicenter phase III study. A total of 5637 patients diagnosed with early breast cancer with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, node positive, and high risk of recurrence were included. High risk was defined as patients with 4 or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes and at least one of the following: tumor size ≥5 cm, histologic grade 3, or Ki-67≥20%. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive adjuvant abemaciclib+endocrine therapy (n = 2808) or endocrine therapy alone (n = 2829) for 2 years, with endocrine therapy prescribed for at least 5 years. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15.5 months, abemaciclib+endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus endocrine therapy alone [HR = 0.747 (95% CI 0.598-0.932), P = 0.0096]; achieving an absolute improvement of 3.5% invasive disease-free survival rate at 2-years. These results were maintained, with a median follow-up of 27.7 months: absolute improvement of 2.7% and 5.4% in invasive disease-free survival rate at 2 and 3 years, respectively. All-causality grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 45.9% for abemaciclib and 12.9% for endocrine therapy, and included neutropenia (19.6% vs. 0.8%), leukopenia (11.4% vs. 0.4%), and diarrhea (7.8% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pivotal trial are sufficient to consider abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment for high-risk early breast cancer in highly selected patients. However, in order to the efficacy results present less uncertainty, we must wait for a evaluation later, in which we can have a mature determination at 3 years (with more patients at risk).

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: febrero, marzo y abril 2023 / Positive assessment of drugs: february, march and april 2023

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en febrero, marzo y abril de 2023 considerados de mayor interés para los profesionales sanitarios. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento. (AU)

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency issued in February, March and April 2023, and considered of interest to healthcare professionals, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product. (AU)

Evaluación positiva de medicamentos: febrero, marzo y abril 2023 / Positive assessment of drugs: february, march and april 2023

Se reseñan los medicamentos evaluados y con dictamen positivo por comisión de expertos de la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios o de la Agencia Europea del Medicamento hechos públicos en febrero, marzo y abril de 2023 considerados de mayor interés para los profesionales sanitarios. Se trata de opiniones técnicas positivas que son previas a la autorización y puesta en el mercado del medicamento. (AU)

The drugs assessed by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products or European Medicines Agency issued in February, March and April 2023, and considered of interest to healthcare professionals, are reviewed. These are positive technical reports prior to the authorization and placing on the market of the product. (AU)

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Chronic Urticaria / El papel de la terapia adyuvante en el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica espontánea

Recent guideline on the management of urticaria recommends second-generation H1-antihistamine as the first-line therapy, with dose increases of up to fourfold if inadequately controlled. However, the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often disappointing, so additional adjuvant therapies are needed to increase the effectiveness of first-line therapy, especially in patients who are refractory to the increase of antihistamine doses. Recent studies recommend various adjuvant therapy modalities for CSU, such as biological agents, immunosuppressants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, H2-antihistamine, sulfones, autologous serum therapy, phototherapy, vitamin D, antioxidants, and probiotics. This literature review was made to determine the effectiveness of various adjuvant therapies in managing CSU (AU)

Las directrices actuales para el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica recomiendan los antihistamínicos H1 de segunda generación como tratamiento de primera línea, con un aumento de hasta 4 veces la dosis si no se controla. Sin embargo, la terapia en la urticaria crónica espontánea suele ser decepcionante, por lo que es necesario un tratamiento adyuvante adicional para mejorar la eficacia de la terapia, especialmente en los pacientes que son refractarios a dosis mayores de antihistamínicos. Las investigaciones más recientes recomiendan varias modalidades de tratamiento adyuvante para la urticaria crónica espontánea, como los agentes biológicos, los inmunosupresores, los antagonistas de los receptores de leucotrienos, los antihistamínicos H2, las sulfonas, la terapia con suero autólogo, la fototerapia, la vitamina D, los antioxidantes y los probióticos. Esta revisión bibliográfica presenta estudios recientes sobre la eficacia de diversas terapias adyuvantes en el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica espontánea (AU)

[Artículo traducido] El papel de la terapia adyuvante en el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica espontánea / The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Chronic Urticaria

Las directrices actuales para el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica recomiendan los antihistamínicos H1 de segunda generación como tratamiento de primera línea, con un aumento de hasta 4 veces la dosis si no se controla. Sin embargo, la terapia en la urticaria crónica espontánea suele ser decepcionante, por lo que es necesario un tratamiento adyuvante adicional para mejorar la eficacia de la terapia, especialmente en los pacientes que son refractarios a dosis mayores de antihistamínicos. Las investigaciones más recientes recomiendan varias modalidades de tratamiento adyuvante para la urticaria crónica espontánea, como los agentes biológicos, los inmunosupresores, los antagonistas de los receptores de leucotrienos, los antihistamínicos H2, las sulfonas, la terapia con suero autólogo, la fototerapia, la vitamina D, los antioxidantes y los probióticos. Esta revisión bibliográfica presenta estudios recientes sobre la eficacia de diversas terapias adyuvantes en el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica espontánea (AU)

Recent guideline on the management of urticaria recommends second-generation H1-antihistamine as the first-line therapy, with dose increases of up to fourfold if inadequately controlled. However, the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often disappointing, so additional adjuvant therapies are needed to increase the effectiveness of first-line therapy, especially in patients who are refractory to the increase of antihistamine doses. Recent studies recommend various adjuvant therapy modalities for CSU, such as biological agents, immunosuppressants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, H2-antihistamine, sulfones, autologous serum therapy, phototherapy, vitamin D, antioxidants, and probiotics. This literature review was made to determine the effectiveness of various adjuvant therapies in managing CSU (AU)

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Chronic Urticaria. / [Artículo traducido] El papel de la terapia adyuvante en el tratamiento de la urticaria crónica espontánea.

Recent guideline on the management of urticaria recommends second-generation H1-antihistamine as the first-line therapy, with dose increases of up to fourfold if inadequately controlled. However, the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often disappointing, so additional adjuvant therapies are needed to increase the effectiveness of first-line therapy, especially in patients who are refractory to the increase of antihistamine doses. Recent studies recommend various adjuvant therapy modalities for CSU, such as biological agents, immunosuppressants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, H2-antihistamine, sulfones, autologous serum therapy, phototherapy, vitaminD, antioxidants, and probiotics. This literature review was made to determine the effectiveness of various adjuvant therapies in managing CSU.

Supervivencia a dos años en pacientes con cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado en una institución de Popayán entre 2018 y 2020 / Two-year survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer at an institution in Popayán between 2018 and 2020

Introducción. El tratamiento oncológico perioperatorio en pacientes con cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado está indicado; aun así, no siempre es posible. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la supervivencia de los pacientes según la administración de quimioterapia perioperatoria. Métodos. Estudio observacional, tipo cohorte ambispectivo, incluyendo pacientes con cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado quienes recibieron o no quimioterapia perioperatoria. Resultados. Se incluyeron 33 pacientes, 90,9 % pertenecían al régimen subsidiado de salud y el 78,8 % en estadio T4. El grupo que recibió quimioterapia perioperatoria, que solo tuvo 5 pacientes (15,1 %), presentó mayor supervivencia global a 2 años (100 %), seguido del grupo de quimioterapia postoperatoria (58,8 %) y del grupo sin quimioterapia, que alcanzó una supervivencia global a 2 años de 54,5 %. Discusión. La supervivencia global fue mayor en el grupo de quimioterapia perioperatoria, consonante a lo descrito a nivel internacional, aunque los pacientes se encontraban en un estadío localmente más avanzado, la mayoría con T4 y N+ según AJCC VIII edición. Conclusiones. El estadío clínico es un factor pronóstico importante y, en nuestro medio, la mayoría de los pacientes consultan en estadíos localmente más avanzados. A eso se suman las dificultades en el acceso a la atención en salud. Aun así, la quimioterapia perioperatoria mostró una supervivencia mayor en pacientes con cáncer gástrico localmente avanzado

Introduction. Perioperative cancer treatment in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer is indicated; even so, it is not always possible. The objective was to evaluate survival according to time and receipt of perioperative chemotherapy. Methods. Observational study, ambispective cohort type, including patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received or did not receive perioperative chemotherapy. Results. Thirty-three patients were included, 90.9% belonged to the subsidized regimen and 78.8% with TNM T4. The perioperative chemotherapy group, which only had five patients (15.1%), had a higher overall survival at 2 years (100%), followed by the postoperative chemotherapy group and by the group without chemotherapy, with an overall survival at 2 years of 58.8% and 54.5%, respectively. Discussion. Overall survival was higher in the perioperative chemotherapy group, consistent with what has been described internationally, although the patients were in a more advanced stage, most being with T4 and N+ according to the AJCC VIII edition. Conclusions. The clinical stage is an important prognostic factor and in our environment, most patients consult in more advanced stages, coupled with difficulties in accessing health care. Even so, perioperative chemotherapy showed a longer survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, the data should not be extrapolated since the number of patients in each group is significantly different

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Chronic Urticaria.

Recent guideline on the management of urticaria recommends second-generation H1-antihistamine as the first-line therapy, with dose increases of up to fourfold if inadequately controlled. However, the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often disappointing, so additional adjuvant therapies are needed to increase the effectiveness of first-line therapy, especially in patients who are refractory to the increase of antihistamine doses. Recent studies recommend various adjuvant therapy modalities for CSU, such as biological agents, immunosuppressants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, H2-antihistamine, sulfones, autologous serum therapy, phototherapy, vitamin D, antioxidants, and probiotics. This literature review was made to determine the effectiveness of various adjuvant therapies in managing CSU.

Indicaciones para el uso de pertuzumab en cáncer de mama HER2 positivono metastásico en los escenarios neoadyuvante y adyuvante. Revisión de la evidencia y abordaje terapéutico en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia / Indications for the use of pertuzumab in non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant. Review of the literature and therapeutic approach at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

La adición de la terapia dirigida a la quimioterapia citotóxica en pacientes con cáncer de mama ha mejorado significativamente los desenlaces oncológicos en las pacientes con tumores HER2 positivo. El uso de pertuzumab durante el manejo neoadyuvante incrementa significativamente la respuesta patológica completa y en la actualidad permite emplear regímenes libres de antraciclinas con una eficacia similar y menores efectos cardiovasculares (en especial sobre la fracción de eyección). El beneficio en supervivencia libre de enfermedad invasiva, de adicionar pertuzumab en el escenario adyuvante en las pacientes sin tratamiento anti HER2 previo, está limitado a aquellas con ganglios positivos. La implementación de esquemas con bloqueo dual anti HER2, durante el tratamiento inicial del cáncer de mama HER2 positivo, mejora significativamente el pronóstico oncológico en este grupo de pacientes.

The addition of targeted therapy to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer has significantly improved oncologic outcomes in patients with HER2-positive tumors. The use of pertuzumab during neoadjuvant management significantly increases the complete pathological response and currently allows the use of anthracycline-free regimens with similar efficacy and fewer cardiovascular effects (especially on ejection fraction). The benefit of pertuzumab in disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting for patients without prior anti-HER2 treatment is limited to those with positive nodes. The implementation of schemes with dual anti-HER2 blockade during the initial treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer significantly improves the oncological outcomes in this group of patients.

Caracterización sobre los pacientes operados de cáncer colorrectal tratados con quimioterapia adyuvante en Camagüey

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal es un problema de salud creciente en el mundo, el aumento en la expectativa de vida de las poblaciones, el continuo mejoramiento de las técnicas de tamizaje y la búsqueda activa de casos, son las razones por las cuales cada año se informa un aumento en el número global de casos diagnosticados con cáncer. Objetivo: Caracterizar a los pacientes operados de cáncer colorrectal tratados con quimioterapia. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo de corte transversal, en pacientes atendidos en la consulta multidisciplinaria de cáncer colorrectal. El universo lo conformaron todos los pacientes que acudieron a consulta en ese período, la muestra a criterio de los autores la conformaron 55 pacientes tratados con quimioterapia adyuvantes por cáncer colorrectal. La fuente primaria de la investigación estuvo dada por la historia clínica. Resultados: En cuanto a la relación sexo y edad, se observó una mayor frecuencia del grupo de 70-79 años y en el sexo femenino. Según la localización topográfica existió predominio en colon sigmoides con 33 pacientes para un 60 % de la muestra estudiada. La variante histológica adenocarcinoma moderadamente diferenciado fue la de mayor presentación. Predominaron los pacientes en estadio IIIa de la enfermedad. El esquema de quimioterapia usado con mayor frecuencia fue el Folfox. Conclusiones: En la muestra, la mayoría de los pacientes estuvieron incluidos en el grupo etáreo entre 70-79 años de edad. La localización topográfica más frecuente fue el colon sigmoide y el tipo histológico, el adenocarcinoma moderadamente diferenciado. Predominaron los pacientes en el estadio IIIa y el tratamiento con quimioterapia adyuvante más utilizado fue el esquema de Folfox.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a growing health problem in the world, the increase in the life expectancy of populations, the continuous improvement of screening techniques and the active search for cases, are the reasons why an increase in the global number of cases diagnosed with cancer is reported each year. Objective: To characterize the patients operated on for colorectal cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in patients seen at the multidisciplinary colorectal cancer clinic. The universe was made up of all the patients who attended the consultation in that period, the sample at the authors' criteria was made up of 55 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. The primary source of the investigation was given by the clinical history. Results: Regarding the relationship between sex and age, a higher frequency was observed in the group of 70-79 years and in the female sex. Regarding the topographic location, there was a predominance in the sigmoid colon with 33 patients for 60% of the sample studied. The moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma histological variant was the one with the highest presentation. Patients in stage IIIa of the disease were more frequent. The most frequently used chemotherapy regimen was Folfox. Conclusions: In the sample, most of the patients were included in the age group between 70-79 years of age. The most frequent topographic location was the sigmoid colon and the histological type was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Patients in stage IIIa predominated and the most widely used adjuvant chemotherapy treatment was the Folfox regimen.

Quimioterapia adyuvante en cáncer epitelial de ovario en estadios avanzados / Adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer

Objetivo: describir la experiencia en el manejo de quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes con cáncer epitelial avanzado de ovario en el Hospital de San José, Bogotá, Colombia, entre 2016 y 2020. Materiales y métodos: estudio de cohorte histórica descriptiva de pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer epitelial del ovario, citorreducción quirúrgica completa y que recibieron 6 ciclos de quimioterapia con carboplatino-paclitaxel. El tiempo del seguimiento fue aproximadamente 1 año. Resultados: de 45 pacientes estudiadas con citorreducción óptima el cáncer progresó después de la quimioterapia adyuvante en 13/45 casos (29%), presentó respuesta parcial en 2/45 casos (4%) y completa en 30/45 (66.6). En estadio quirúrgico avanzado (estadios III y IV FIGO 2014) la neoplasia progresó en 12/36 pacientes (33.3%), hubo respuesta parcial en 2/36 (5.6%) y completa en 22/36 (61%). Los efectos adversos al tratamiento de quimioterapia fueron (n = 45/45, 100%), alopecia (n = 45/45, 100%), náuseas y vómito (n = 30/45, 67%), artralgias (n = 10/45, 22%), neuropatías periféricas reportada como parestesias en manos y pies (n = 6/45, 13%) y un caso (2%) de toxicidad hematológica grado I (neutropenia leve). Conclusiones: 66,6% de las pacientes con cáncer epitelial de ovario manejadas con citorreducción óptima y quimioterapia adyuvante tuvieron respuesta completa a la quimioterapia, con mejor tolerancia a los efectos adversos de la quimioterapia (carboplatino-paclitaxel).

Objective: to describe the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Hospital de San José, Bogotá, Colombia, between 2016 and 2020. Materials and methods: a descriptive historical cohort study in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer managed with complete surgical cytoreduction followed by 6 carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy cycles. The follow-up time was approximately 1 year. Results: out of the 45 studied patients managed with optimal cytoreduction followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, cancer progression was observed in 13/45 (29%) cases, 2/45 (4%) showed partial response and 30/45 (66.6%) showed complete response. Chemotherapy-related adverse effects occurred in (n = 45/45, 100%), including alopecia (n = 45/45, 100%), nausea and vomiting (n = 30/45, 67%), arthralgia (n = 10/45, 22%), peripheral neuropathy reported as hands and feet paresthesia (n = 6/45, 13%) and one case (2%) had grade I hematologic toxicity (mild neutropenia). Conclusions: 66.6% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with optimal cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited complete response to chemotherapy with better tolerance to chemotherapy (carboplatin-paclitaxel) related adverse effects.